Searching for search and finding Godot

The battle for search eyeballs is heating up again. The model has been shown to work and Google is now Ad Mogul extraordinaire. Microsoft in classic fashion has tried, learned and is trying again. Yahoo has had much publicized struggles. Even new players are coming into the space. The buzz about Wolfram Alpha is everywhere.

What this next level of competition is about is relevance of information. The reason Google initially made inroads with search was their optimization routines and ability to give people search results that were relevant to what they wanted. Recent additions such as the ability to promote and bury links based on your own preference are continued iterations of this optimization. Similarly iGoogle and personalized history of search with functions like returning the link you clicked on last time you searched for something are again continued iterations.

The next generation of search is taking more of that sea of information that is out there and turning it into something useful. This is both good and bad. It's good/great in terms of making things digestible and understandable, especially when you are researching a particular topic. But it is less so when what is important is being determined for you and you loose some of the outliers. Outliers are where innovation happens. This is not to say that results don't get buried with a raw information return because they certainly do but just as with code and layers of abstraction, with great power comes great responsibility and the need to know what is going on behind the scenes. In many cases this behind the scenes is proprietary information and algorithms that companies (rightly) don't want to share as their secret sauce. What a dilemma.

Wolfram Alpha is the new kid on the block and have gotten a lot of Internet love with an effective launch that you could watch in video live. It's cool for checking out what happened on the day you were born, doing research on specific items and generally getting a quick easy view of relevant data to concrete topics.

Microsoft Live didn't really live up to what was desired by Microsoft but they are back and ready for round two with their new search engine Bing. (I thought that was the sound the Southwest ads used for new deals?) Bing is in pre-launch and is supposed to do a lot of what Wolfram does and use other proprietary correlation tools to give better and deeper results. ComputerWorld has a nice Visual Tour of the functionality to give a good idea of what is coming.

That leaves Google. Google's new exciting new news is the pre-pumping of Google Wave. If buzz on the Internet is any indicator there is a lot of excitement and potential here as well. If it wasn't clear why there was rumored interest in Twitter from Google it is now. Wave is intended to be a merge of... well... everything Just In Time.

So, it looks like the observation that the next generation of systems are about visualization and the presentation of information, not just finding it. Boy won't this be fun to watch.

More cloud updates

Since my last post I have been sent a few and read a few other articles that I thought might be worthy of note related to what clouds are and why it is important.

Sun's CTO Greg Papadopoulos did an interview with Informationweek and discussed some of the efforts that SUN has going on. One of the biggest items of note in that article is the new Drizzle product coming out of the MySQL work. There are many articles and blog posts on the topic as well but the gist is that it is an effort to Cloud-smarten MySQL. Seeing how "MySQL gets used, people only use a subset of the relational capabilities because it has a horizontal scale and there are all these concerns that go into large-scale deployments. So Drizzle sort of strips back down to a small core and then builds up the distributed capabilities." I have made no secret of my feeling that Data is no longer relational. So I think this is encouraging news though as seems to be the case lately with SUN it may be too late for MySQL.

(Aside... Greg Papadopoulos and David Douglas recently co-authored Citizen Engineer: A handbook for socially responsible engineering. Though it is not yet available you can check out an interview with David Douglas on the book and engineering at the Mercury News. Personally I find this to be a refreshing take on the responsibility of Engineering as a profession and all of the personal and corporate responsibility that should go along with it.)

As if they noticed Microsoft pushing cloud tech Amazon announced a few new items in their own cloud initiatives. The ability to reserve capacity for known needs. They also expanded the ability of Windows based services in another Amazon zone. All of this from a company that sells stuff, proof that necessity is the mother of invention.

Even Microsoft realizes it’s all about the cloud. (though opinions still differ on what a cloud exactly is… I personally like the blind men describing the elephant/cloud analogy)

Wired did an interview with Ray Ozzie - Long article but worth reading even if you are an ABM coalition member. (I have always thought highly of Ray Ozzie, even if I did hate Notes itself as an administrator and user, it was visionary in its setup and ahead of its time. Heck… Ray even saw P2P coming before the rest of the industry started to catch up.)

Further proof of the gap between the over-served and the under-served. The question is if Microsoft is late enough to the cloud innovation game that their delay will actually cause them harm in market share. They have rallied before and come in with overwhelming response. (e.g. I.E.) The truth is the services such as PPT, DOC etc is so ubiquitous in the work environment it will be difficult to displace them with anything else. The question though becomes more of what will happen to those types of documents and will they be service disassembled themselves enabling other innovation plugs to go in. Also, who knows maybe Microsoft will have the bones to push further change into media distribution and synch. Though Apple has a pretty strong hold and the media providers can’t seem to understand that technology can help versus hurt their business (self destroying DVRs anyone? Eventually a multi-billion dollar DVD business… sigh)

What a great time to be a technologist.

Microsoft bid to buy Yahoo

It has been in the rumor mill for a while now that Microsoft was seeking to buy Yahoo. When there is sufficient smoke there seems to be fire and now the deal is officially proceeding. There are reasons for it and reasons against it. Apparently Live has not pulled in the traction that Microsoft wants and the desire for ad revenue and internet traffic control as a business model is

Google brings up some interesting points on the combination having more webmail and portal traffic than anyone else and Microsofts track record of following the path of Embrace, Extend, Exterminate when it comes to competition. But that input from a competitor is unlikely to bring about any sort of block of the deal. In fact some reports are even suggesting that the deal could be good for competition.

I am not 100% decided on the deal and it's positive or negative effects. Microsoft has a long record of proven execution and when they really set their eyes on something they can make it happen. There is a wide range of incredibly bright people there that when unified to a cause can deliver. The big change that I see though is in release management. Microsoft has a history of classical software development with releases taking years and subsequent patches taking months. In the internet world, and Google is a great example of this, change is constant, the ability to roll out new versions and try new approaches every week is key to success. This will be a big change from the default Microsoft dev approach. Will this Agile development change cross over into Microsoft's standard products? Another one of those much discussed items, SAAS Software As A Service suddenly becomes a lot more of a potential reality. To me this is the real reason for the desired purchase. Ads and Eyeballs are great to monetize and transform what Microsoft has done for a long time.

No matter what finally happens, this aught to be fun to watch.

WARNING... FOR YOUR SAFETY...

Most home invasions come in through Windows...

Saw this come accross the wire on the Ubuntu site and laughed out loud after watching it. I thought it ranked up there with the Ruby Commercials. Of course it's a little simplistic since we all know there are vulnerabilities in Linux as well as Windows. Though the frequent target is certainly Windows due to the ABM (Anything But Microsoft) cooalition's distaste for the "evil empire".

Step 1... round up the lawyers

We have all heard the jokes and everyone has read the phrase before. The first step to improvement is round up the lawyers and send them to the bottom of the ocean.

If you have had your head under a rock or otherwise not seen any tech news lately you may have missed some of the latest fun with lawyers and the grand FUD they can churn up.

First Microsoft came out with a statements about how Open Source has violated 235 of their patents. Of course no details were provided on the patents themselves just a bit of churn and great press. Using their recent deal with Novell for patent sharing (Read my post on how when you wrestle a pig you both get dirty but the pig likes it for more info) as an example of "good" behavior they encouraged others to strike similar deals. Part of the real fun in all of this is how at the same time Microsoft was (out of another side of it's mouth some might say) calling for Patent reform due to suits from others against their own patent infringements.

Then the Linux foundation crafted a rebuttal. As would be expected they called out Microsoft on what the patents were. They clearly called out the FUD aspect and took a more offensive approach and begun to fund patent claims among other actions. Spinning from IBM, Sun and even Nokia releasing patents for Open Source use this approach seems to be gaining momentum.

Now the new GPLv3 is even including language that would cause Microsoft to loose rights to sue if the new Linux license terms in GPLv3 go forward. Further complicating this is how the deal with Novell may actually be what causes Microsoft to loose enforceability on the patents. Now even Novell is exploring patent reform. Even going so far as to fund "Patent Busting" activities.

Wow... I guess if you are a lawyer this would be fun or at least profitable. But as a techy I have to just sit back, pop some popcorn and watch the show.

When you wrestle a pig you both get dirty but the pig likes it

The next in the significant Open Source events category is one that occurred with Microsoft and Novell. (Yes, that Microsoft). This deal has to do with Linux as well, but in this case its SUSE that is under discussion. Read the announcement or watch the video footage if you want more detail.

The pundits on this one are even more passionate. (As if we would expect anything else with that Microsoft being involved) Linux Journal likens the deal to Racketeering from Microsoft with FUD sowing from Novell/SUSE. Bernard Golden claims the deal just proves that Open Source is important to your future.

According to the Public Relations statements by both companies the deal is all about Virtualization, Web Services Management and Document Format Compatibility. It is also a five year patent protection agreement where Microsoft agrees not to sue users of SUSE if there is any patent infringement in the SUSE system.

My thoughts around this go immediately to other companies that have made a deal with the devil... err... I mean entered into cooperation agreements with Microsoft. (And no I am not an ABM Coalition card holder. I actually have a fascination and respect for Microsoft, .NET in particular and even SQL Server... I just think that from a business perspective you have to realize what you are dealing with) Take for example Sybase.... Somewhere around Sybase version 4.9.2 Sybase and Oracle were the big mean Relational databases competing tooth and nail with one another. Sybase was, at the time, viewed as slightly more technically advanced while Oracle had better marketing. Sybase then entered into a cooperation agreement with Microsoft to build a version of their database product specially tuned for the Microsoft Environment. A great move, they would get information from Microsoft on the particulars of the platform, build a super tuned engine and everyone would benefit... right? They were very successful, the product created is the forefather of the now nearly everywhere Microsoft SQL Server. As far as what Sybase got out of the deal... they got some short term revenue in the first few years of the agreement before it ended and Microsoft took things over. (Honest, they are still in business now) Other deals that can be pointed to include Borland... Symantec... Corel... need I say more?

Not that this will end up being an end of the world. Just like Microsoft owns the productivity suite on Apple they will likely get the information they need to build and own the productivity suite market on Linux. If .NET components run and integrate well with other platforms but work best on Windows platforms... hasn't Microsoft always been very good at Embrace, Extend, Exterminate?

Another one that will be fun to watch.